• air-jordan-3
  • air-jordan-3-fire-red
  • air-jordan-3-infrared-23
  • air-jordan-3-powder-blue
  • air-jordan-3-white-cement
  • air-jordan-4-bred
  • air-jordan-4-columbia
  • air-jordan-4-oreo
  • air-jordan-4-white-cement
  • air-jordan-5-fire-red
  • air-jordan-5-grape
  • air-jordan-5-oreo
  • air-jordan-5-v
  • air-jordan-6
  • air-jordan-6-carmines
  • air-jordan-6-olympic
  • air-jordan-7-bordeaux
  • air-jordan-7-french-blue
  • air-jordan-7-marvin-the-martian
  • air-jordan-8
  • air-jordan-8-bugs-bunny
  • air-jordan-8-chrome
  • air-jordan-8-playoffs
  • air-jordan-9
  • air-jordan-9-birmingham-barons
  • air-jordan-9-cool-grey
  • air-jordan-10-chicago
  • air-jordan-10-powder-blue
  • air-jordan-10-stealth
  • air-jordan-11-gamma-blue
  • air-jordan-11-legend-blue
  • air-jordan-11-low
  • air-jordan-11-low-bred
  • air-jordan-11-low-citrus
  • air-jordan-12-gamma-blue
  • air-jordan-12-obsidian
  • air-jordan-12-taxi
  • air-jordan-13
  • air-jordan-13-he-got-game
  • air-jordan-14
  • Category Archives Photography

    Hi Gang: I took last week off and headed up to Kennebunkport, Maine with my family for a week of just doin' nuthin'. It's so hot down in Florida, my wife wanted to spend a week someplace where you didn't break into a sweat just looking out the window, so off to Maine we went. Although we were there for a week, I only went "shooting" twice (well, technically two and half times, as you'll read in a moment). Once when we took a one-day trip up to Bar Harbor (about four hours away), and once with my buddies Scott Eccleston and his photography business partner Mark Hensley (both of whom I met on my first trip up there back in July of 2007). Here are a few shots I got along the way (I haven't gone through all of them---I had a flight…

    Hi Gang: Just a quick update from Los Angeles where I just spent an amazing day with entertainment photographer Jeremy Cowart shooting two live on-location classes for KelbyTraining.com I always feel like, if I take a class and I learn even one new thing, it was totally worth it. We were only about 30 minutes into Jeremy's first class and I had already learned half a dozen new things. I was blown away! By the time the class was over, my head was swimming with new ideas, and things I just had never thought of. I called my wife at the end the day and here's exactly what I told her: "I learned more about photography today than I have in the past year!" I'm not kidding. We filmed both classes in the same documentary style as our online class "A Day With Jay…

    What a perfect day! I just got back last night, I'm still grinning about the wonderful day I had shooting the Cubbies. Even though I was in/out the same day (flying up from Tampa for the game), it was totally worth it. Wrigley Field is truly a Magical Place I had never been to Wrigley field before (one of the last classic iconic ballparks in America), and as much as I love Boston's Fenway Park, I think Wrigley truly takes the cake. It's everything from the hand-updated scoreboard, to the ivy in the outfield, to the way the park blends in, lives, and breathes with the surrounding neighborhood. I can't imagine a better place to take in a game. (Above: An 8-frame pano taken from the 2nd deck, right behind home plate---click on it for a larger view) Cubs Fans Rule! The Cubbies are…

    Hi Gang: Just a quick follow-up on yesterday's post about the lack of framing and mat sizes for digital photographers. (1) First, I learned something new about the origin of framing sizes from one of my readers: Paul Brooks, who wrote: I agree Scott. But, you actually have missed a very important point. 4×5 and 8×10 are aspect ratios of View Cameras, which were translated somewhat with medium format 120 and 220 film sizes, but 35mm frames were approximately 1?x 1 1/2?, the same aspect ratio (1/1.5) that digital cameras have. So, that means that the framing industry was outdated when 35mm was popular. I hated to have to crop or do funny matting to print and frame full frame 35mm when I shot film. It doesn’t look like they will ever learn! Thanks Paul. Of course, learning this makes the situation even worse…

    I don't usually like to start off Monday with a rant, but...it's 2010. 10 years into the 21st century. So, why is the framing industry still only making frames and mats in sizes for traditional 35mm film prints? Seriously. Most of the big camera companies stopped making film cameras years ago. Kodak itself has killed off most of their own print film as well because it's a digital photography world---yet when you go to buy a frame for your photos you are instantly teleported back to the 1990s when it comes to frame and mat sizing. Who are they making these frame sizes for? Now, I know there has to be some semi-legitimate reason for this, and I would love it if somebody from the framing industry would share that with all of us, 'cause cropping our images to fit these outdated sizes keeps…

    The gang at Adorama Camera up in New York City (the Platinum sponsors of my official World Wide Photo Walk), heard I was in town today for my Lightroom 3 Live Tour at the Javits Center, so on Sunday they invited me to lead a local Photo Walk, where we'd go out shooting for a couple of hours, and then head back to Adorama HQ for some Photoshop techniques on how to post process the images from the day. I have to say, it was my most fun Photo Walk ever, because so many amazing things happened along the way. In case it rained, as a back-up plan Adorama hired a professional model we could shoot in the studio, but as it turned out, we had great weather so she came out on location with us, and I did a session a shooting with…

    Close